Expert Source citing, costa V FCA

But what if the force was greater than that from a faster deploying AHR than the court knew about?

What if the manner in which the injured was unique and had an additional compounding factor?

Screenshot slow motion video source above https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iBIfnZ-S4Ls

The AHR's are designed to fully deploy and catch the head before the head starts to move backwards from a rear end collision, they are not designed or intended to catapult the head particularly in the manner I describe as the pinball effect.  A signal from the rear vehicle tells the AHR release due to a rear end collision, as designed.  The crash test video starts at -6ms until impact, At 23ms after impact the top of AHR has just released, as it should, when it doesn't deploy from manufacturer known defect.

-6ms until impact, it can be observed top of AHR where plastic meets padding, there is no distance indicating a deployment signal has not yet been sent from airbag controller.

At 25ms after impact gap between AHR platic and top of padding can be seen indicating control deployment signal has been received from rear vehicle sensor.  It can be observed the normal driving distance between the head and AHR is maintained.

Safety strap slack after full deployment.

Attorney cited Below is for video reference only, I have No Attorney Client affiliation at this time.