FCA Chrysler admits complaints of random headrest deployments causing accidents and injuries.  NHTSA states those injuries are to mostly women and Children.  They admit an oil contaminant in the manufacturing process potentially in millions of aging vehicles is causing the random deployments from a chemical breakdown of internal parts,  yet no recall has been issued.

These “safety” devices, in potentially millions of vehicles from 2010 to August 2017, deploy without warning as you will see for yourself is 3 times faster than an airbag. FCA Chrysler's stance is that the defective headrests have virtually zero chance of causing harm. They offered me just $2,400, not because they assessed my damages, but out of "pity" or was it as a message, a joke?

 I advocate for FCA Chrysler to become a Great U.S Auto-manufacturer again. Treating loyal customers fairly takes a back seat to profit, it seems, but change that and the company can restore faith and Profits.

I ask you to join me in fighting against defiance of common sense.

All comments on this cite are from the personal opinions of non-Attorney Emory Caudill;

Costa V FCA excerpts;

In Arizona and many other states, the Eggshell Skull Doctrine holds that individuals with pre-existing conditions, like veterans or the elderly, are entitled to full compensation for injuries (1) . Chrysler, now Stellantis, seems to deny this, potentially shifting medical costs to Medicare. Taxpayers shouldn't bear these costs for injuries caused by defective headrests. Shouldn't they receive a refund instead?

For this to happen, Stellantis would need to admit the devices can cause harm, but with possibility of numerous NDAs, the full extent is unclear and why we need the Sunlight on litigation act to open up NDA's in matters of public safety.

Their corporate culture of corruption, evidenced by two criminal probation sentences (2) (3), persists in my belief, my treatment and discoveries I share for your decision on that matter.

1. Cornell Law / 2. Criminal Probation / Criminal Probation UAW bribery

Though Costa V FCA Jury Verdict, FCA did not have to pay any damages in the Class action suit,  however, as seen below, FCA was found guilty of unfair act and Practices.

Other users guides warned not just of Loose cargo but warned of body parts like a hand or foot hitting the AHR and could cause "Accidental" deployment and injury.  Why didn't they mention a head?

Calling an Owners Manual a Users Guide is it for legal reasons?

The users guide in our 2017 Jeep Patriot, instructs to pull/push on the headrest to adjust it, how far?

They don't say but to do that on a potentially defective one, well perhaps that is where those facial and hand lacerations the media reported came from?  You see if an injury happened from a defective random deployment, that would apply to a user and not just an owner.

Keep in mind users manuals also state the AHRs have no distinguishable markings and the AHR, the owners manual for the 2016 Patriot an owner "with the AHRs" allowed me to view and photograph has ZERO mention of AHR's , like us, he thought he had a regular old head rest. Some   Owners state they didn't get a manual when buying a vehicle.

 FCA Chrysler admits complaints of random headrest deployments causing accidents and injuries.  NHTSA states those injuries are to mostly women and Children.  They admit an oil contaminant in the manufacturing process potentially in millions of aging vehicles is causing the random deployments from a chemical breakdown of internal parts,  yet no recall has been issued.

These “safety” devices, in potentially millions of vehicles from 2010 to August 2017, deploy without warning as you will see for yourself is 3 times faster than an airbag. FCA Chrysler's stance is that the defective headrests have virtually zero chance of causing harm. They offered me just $2,400, not because they assessed my damages, but out of "pity" or was it as a message, a joke?

 I advocate for FCA Chrysler to become a Great U.S Auto-manufacturer again. Treating loyal customers fairly takes a back seat to profit, it seems, but change that and the company can restore faith and Profits.

I ask you to join me in fighting against defiance of common sense.

All comments on this cite are from the personal opinions of non-Attorney Emory Caudill;

Costa V FCA excerpts;

In Arizona and many other states, the Eggshell Skull Doctrine holds that individuals with pre-existing conditions, like veterans or the elderly, are entitled to full compensation for injuries (1) . Chrysler, now Stellantis, seems to deny this, potentially shifting medical costs to Medicare. Taxpayers shouldn't bear these costs for injuries caused by defective headrests. Shouldn't they receive a refund instead?

For this to happen, Stellantis would need to admit the devices can cause harm, but with possibility of numerous NDAs, the full extent is unclear and why we need the Sunlight on litigation act to open up NDA's in matters of public safety.

Their corporate culture of corruption, evidenced by two criminal probation sentences (2) (3), persists in my belief, my treatment and discoveries I share for your decision on that matter.

1. Cornell Law / 2. Criminal Probation / Criminal Probation UAW bribery

Though Costa V FCA Jury Verdict, FCA did not have to pay any damages in the Class action suit,  however, as seen below, FCA was found guilty of unfair act and Practices.

Other users guides warned not just of Loose cargo but warned of body parts like a hand or foot hitting the AHR and could cause "Accidental" deployment and injury.  Why didn't they mention a head?

Calling an Owners Manual a Users Guide is it for legal reasons?

The users guide in our 2017 Jeep Patriot, instructs to pull/push on the headrest to adjust it, how far?

They don't say but to do that on a potentially defective one, well perhaps that is where those facial and hand lacerations the media reported came from?  You see if an injury happened from a defective random deployment, that would apply to a user and not just an owner.

Keep in mind users manuals also state the AHRs have no distinguishable markings and the AHR, the owners manual for the 2016 Patriot an owner "with the AHRs" allowed me to view and photograph has ZERO mention of AHR's , like us, he thought he had a regular old head rest. Some   Owners state they didn't get a manual when buying a vehicle.